Foundation seeks 'investors'
when it funds disease research
January 14, 2004
BY SANDRA GUY
SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST
Researchers with brilliant but unconventional ideas for
treating diseases face a dilemma common in business: They need money
for research, but investors want to see results first. A
Deerfield-based foundation intent on solving that problem is
launching a new business model that relies less on its founders'
philanthropy and more on fund-raising.
The foundation, Goldman Philanthropic Partnerships, opened
five years ago with millions of dollars in seed money from Lake
Forest entrepreneur George Goldman and his wife, Judy. "Our
purpose was to make sure that 100 percent of a donor's money goes to
research," Goldman said.
Goldman, 71, founder of real estate investment firm Asset
Partners Inc. in Lake Forest, created the foundation to find a cure
for multiple myeloma, a blood-bone cancer, because his wife
developed the incurable disease 14 years ago.
After beginning with a focus on one disease, the foundation
now wants to fund the best research.
"We've gone on to learn that miraculous cures frequently
are found serendipitously -- when someone is searching for a cure
for a certain disease and suddenly discovers that it works for
multiple diseases."
The foundation, though enamored of creative research, sticks
to strict business rules when it funds projects. It investigates the
researcher, determines whether the research has adequate scientific
support, and relies on an independent panel of experts to decide if
the research has a chance of discovering a cure.
If the project is approved, the foundation requires the
companies or universities spearheading the research to finance at
least half the project's cost. Instead of relying on the initial
kitty from the Goldmans, the foundation seeks the remaining funds
from donors with an interest in finding a cure for a specific
disease and then issues quarterly reports to donors, whom it
considers investors.
"It's much like a venture capital process," said
Bruce Bloom, the foundation's CEO. "We actively manage the
projects, including approving reports from the researcher every 90
days." The approach enabled the foundation, with six full-time
workers and a 2003 operating budget of about $500,000, to fund $1.5
million in research last year. The research funding is expected to
nearly double in 2004, to $2.8 million.
The foundation's equivalent of a Reuben Studdard-like
"American Idol" is Vincent Rajkumar, a blood and cancer
specialist at the Mayo Clinic who was unrecognized when the Goldman
Foundation discovered him in 1999. The foundation provided $300,000
to start work on Rajkumar's vision. Since then, he has published
more than 70 articles about his myeloma research breakthroughs and
received $1.5 million in National Institutes of Health funding and
international recognition for his research. The research includes
using the highly controversial drug thalidomide to sustain the lives
of myeloma sufferers.
The foundation also funds research for diseases outside of
the medical mainstream, such as panic attacks. Research at Harvard
Medical School showed that yoga may be the best treatment for panic
attacks, and workbooks are being published for yoga instructors and
for doctors to treat people with the disorder. The foundation
provided $33,000, half the start-up costs of the project.
Locally, the foundation is working with Ilya Koltover, a
researcher at Northwestern University, who has created a
non-infectious virus particle that can be loaded with a drug and
directed to a target cell, such as a cancer cell. The drug either
heals or destroys its target.
The foundation provided a $25,000 pilot grant for the
project.
The foundation also is creating a partnership with the
University of Chicago in which it can call upon the Hyde Park
school's experts to propose research and help decide whether
research projects are viable.
Extending the research network is essential to the
foundation's goal: using business tools to make a significant impact
on finding cures for diseases, and furthering research that is
easily dismissed or overlooked by bureaucratic agencies.
|